Album Review: “Hurley” by Weezer — a ‘Lost’ cause or a return to form?
Artist: Weezer
Album: Hurley
Label: Epitaph
Rating: 7.7/10
Ok… So the good news is that the unfortunately titled, “Hurley”, an album that may be named after the “Lost” character (played by Jorge Garcia, whose face adorns the cover looking like the love child of the late, great Dom Deluise) or more disturbingly a clothing company that sells Weezer products, is Rivers and the boys’ best effort in a decade. The bad news is that it (like every release since the abysmal “Make Believe” album) is touched by cynicism, riddled with pedantic lyrics, and inflated with far too much bombast and far too little of the wistful sentiment that made their first two records so beloved by an adoring and forgiving legion of Weezerheads.
This is not to say that it is a total loss… It’s not by any means. In fact, songwriting-wise (if you can manage to peel away three or four coats of injudiciously slopped on and lacquer-y production) it is a return to the straight ahead pop blazers of the “Blue Album”, albeit a 2010 version, which means no guitar solos, no herky-jerky harmonies and no clever words… and no heart… for the most part.
Those elements that initially made Weezer so exceptional are now replaced with ultra-lush (read over polished) harmonies, headache inducing wall-of-sound guitars and lines like the Post-Beatles-McCartney-esquely pedestrian, “Hang on til I see you again, I’m gonna be more than a friend” a chorus that would’ve never seen daylight in the “Buddy Holly” days.
In short this is fairly lazy music, performed and written by a genius, savant-like songwriter with infinite talent and a professional, studio savvy backing group that are 40+ years old and content with the good life that has been provided for them by a fanbase that’s been expecting their first two albums from them for 16 years and never getting it.
It’s no matter though, because they have, in the interim, picked up enough younger (less discerning) fans on the strength of cash-in singles like “Beverly Hills” and “(If You’re Wondering if I Want You Too) I Want You To)” that it’s become obvious that they don’t feel the need to live up to the weight of those two classics… Or do they?*
Despite all this, there are some really fine moments on the album, particularly the stunning “Unspoken” with its gorgeous flute mellotron, string adornments and strikingly powerful ending and the closing tune; the succinctly philosophical, twelve-string stomper “Time Flies”, maybe their two best compositions since “Pinkerton”. Songs so good, in fact, that they lift the entire album from mediocre to good…. and it’s not coincidental that both sport terrific lyrics, which proves that Rivers still can pump them out when he wants to.
Besides those two gems, the opening trio of tunes (the nostalgic “Memories”, the “Blue”-ish, “Ruling Me” and the acerbic love song “Trainwrecks”) are very solid barn burners. The rest is listenable candy-ish filler that demolishes anything off of “Raditude”, which is saying something.
In the end, the question is will this album be a transition back to the kind of music that they are capable of? I don’t know…maybe?
… and if you haven’t guessed, I’M one of those sad, adoring and forgiving Weezerheads, who like Cubs fans, hope beyond hope every season that the boys will turn it around.
In any case, you can give it listen yourselves, as it’s streaming in its entirety on their MySpace page, at least for the time being anyway!
*Word is that the band is planning a series of smaller concerts in which they will being playing alternate evenings of just the “Blue Album” and “Pinkerton”… count me in for “Pinkerton”.









Brave new World is also good, I think. But spot on review. I’ll be going to both Blue and Pink tours if it happens.
Ho-hum review, yet a 7.7/10 score? There’s a difference between being discerning and contradicting one’s self. More time is spent reminding everyone of the past (blue and pinkerton) and cuomo’s personality than the actual album. Lastly: no heart? Are you serious? Where is this apparent? At least give us an example! Just because Rivers Cuomo is not revealing his innermost secrets on every song, doesn’t mean that weezer still needs to “turn it around.” Oh and by the way: even the blue album and pinkerton were ripped by critics when they were released. Journalists are therefore saying weezer needs to return to the sound that they once dismissed out of hand.
The Blue ALbum was actually pretty universally praised when it came out… Pinkerton I’ll agree was panned.
That’s an actual flute… not a mellotron.
Hmm.. yeah I thought so at first but at the very end it seemed like it was mellotron loop… the tapes have flourishes sometimes.. either way, its not just one flute but a few.. its a nice touch though.. great song as well..
Their best album since Green. And I don’t know what this guy is talking about, but Maladroit is pretty awful, save for Keep Fishin’. Nice to hear a Weezer album that doesn’t have any duds.
Read my detailed review of ‘Hurley’ here: http://realgonerocks.blogspot.com/2010/09/weezer-hurley.html
Real Gone, you give Ric Ocasek way too much credit for the sound of Weezer’s first album. Ric produced my band’s only major label release and I know first-hand that it was engineer Chris Shaw and Rivers who were chiefly responsible for the sound and production..
And change up your blog.. the white text on black background totally fucks with your eyes..