Was the Loch Ness Monster really a dog?‏

For years, the Loch Ness monster has endured as one of the greatest mysteries of the Universe, (along with Big Foot and the appeal of Sarah Palin). Recently a fascinating revelation has cast doubt upon its existence, leaving believers bereft and shaken. The monster was first photographed by Hugh Gray in 1933.At the time,  Gray claimed “I immediately got my camera ready and snapped the object which was then two to three feet above the surface of the water. I did not see any head, for what I took to be the front parts were under the water, but there was considerable movement from what seemed to be the tail.”

 

However, with new technology we can see that Hugh Gray may have been a major bullshit artist!

 

I wonder if the dog was in on it?